AgriNotes & News is published weekly by the Michigan Farm Bureau Information and Public Relations Division.
For more information contact: Jill Corrin, Manager Media Support Services
Phone: (517) 323-6585
Fax: (517) 323-6541
E-mail: mfbinfo@michfb.com

|
|
|
| Calendar of Events |
- June 21-25: Young People's Citizenship Seminar, Alma College
- June 29-July 1: Ag Expo, Michigan State University, East Lansing
- Nov. 30-Dec. 3: MFB Annual Meeting, Grand Traverse Resort
|
| *Attention radio stations: for an audio
report on these releases, call the Michigan Farm Bureau
Radio Newsline, 800-292-2680, ext. 6761 (M-F, 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m.), or (517) 323-6761 anytime. |
Jennifer Vincent, Manager
Media Support Services
Phone: 517-323-6585
Fax: 517-323-6541
mfbinfo@aol.com
|
| This Week: |
In response to overwhelming interest for
another look at successful farmland preservations techniques and
smart land-use programs, the new Michigan Farmland and Community Alliance
is cooperating with MFB and the Rural Development Council of Michigan
to sponsor an Ultimate Farmland Preservation Tour, set for Sept. 9-13.
Click here for full story
For more information, contact Jim Fuerstenau at
800-292-2680, ext. 6550. |
| |
Michigan Farm Bureau has joined Ottawa County
Farm Bureau in its campaign to stop a US-31 rural bypass through the
heart of the state's leading agricultural county.
Click here for full story
For more information, contact Jennifer Vincent at
800-292-2680, ext. 6585. |
| |
Several Michigan farmers urged USDA
and the U.S. trade representative's office to strive for fair trade and
equal treatment around the world as they enter the next round of World
Trade Organization talks.
Click here for full story
For more information, contact Ken Nye at
800-292-2680, ext. 2020. |
| |
The Michigan agriculture industry pumps
more than $35 billion into the economy each year. In the
effort to protect farmland and strengthen Michigan's second-largest
industry, the Michigan Farmland and Community Alliance (MFCA) had
been formed.
Click here for full story
For more information, contact Jim Fuerstenau at
800-292-2680, ext. 6550. |
| Multi-state farmland preservation tour set for Sept. 9-13 |
| Contact: Jim Fuerstenau, 800-292-2680, ext. 6550 |
| |
| LANSING, June 24 - In response to
overwhelming interest for another look at successful farmland
preservation techniques and smart land-user programs, the new
Michigan Farmland and Community Alliance (MFCA) is cooperating
with Michigan Farm Bureau and the Rural Development Council of
Michigan to sponsor an Ultimate Farmland Preservation Tour, set
for Sept. 9-13.
Jim Fuerstenau, MFCA executive director, says the five-day bus tour
will provide participants with a better understanding of some of the
techniques and programs successfully in place in other parts of
the country. &Quot;Armed with that information, we hope that
Michigan leaders and lawmakers will begin to move forward in this
effort to preserve large blocks of contiguous farmland to ensure
agriculture stability and profitability for generations,"
Fuerstenau said.
New Jersey, Maryland and Pennsylvania are the destinations showcasing
smart land-use strategies and programs at both local and state
levels.
"It's a five-day commitment, but a very valuable commitment for
land owners who want and need to learn more, public officials who are
looking for ways to solve problems on a local level, and state
officials who are seeking broader policy that more effectively addresses
this issue of urban sprawl," Fuerstenau said.
This is the third farmland preservation tour sponsored by Michigan
Farm Bureau in the last two years. "On this trip, we're
encouraging not only producers, but also legislators and planning
officials to see how smart growth and farmland preservation programs are
being utilized in other parts of the country," Fuerstenau said.
"This is a great opportunity for us to learn from states that have
been doing this for several years. With this information, it is our
hope that Michigan can develop a program to help secure the future
of our state's second largest industry."
Registration fee is $550, which includes all individual tour expenses,
including meals, lodging and transportation.
To register for the tour, call Jim Fuerstenau at (517) 323-6550. |
| --30-- |
| Michigan Farm Bureau joins campaign to stop
proposed US-31 bypass |
| Contact: Jennifer Vincent, 800-292-2680, ext. 6585 |
| |
| LANSING, June 24 - Michigan Farm
Bureau, the state's largest general farm organization, has
joined Ottawa County Farm Bureau in its campaign to stop a US-31
rural bypass through the heart of the state's leading agricultural
county.
the Michigan Department of Transportation, in an attempt to
alleviate traffic congestion and improve safety along US-31 between
Holland and Grand Haven, last week announced plans to build a
27-mile, rural bypass about 10 miles east of the existing corridor,
rather than rebuilding the current alignment into a limited-access
freeway.
"This decision goes against the state and national push to protect
valuable and productive farmland, while curtailing urban sprawl,"
said Jack Laurie, Michigan Farm Bureau president. "If state
legislators allow this freeway to carve out pieces of the leading
agricultural county in the state, where does it stop? This sets precedent
for future decisions and an attitude that is inconsistent with the
governor's appointment of a farmland preservation force."
Gov. Engler was quoted in a press release describing the rural bypass
option as "the most protective of farmland."
According to MDOT's own lengthy and comprehensive Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS), the bypass consumes 830 acres of prime
farmland immediately, and a projected 13,000 acres in the next 20
years as induced urban sprawl follows. A decision to reconstruct the
existing alignment has a much smaller farmland impact of 169 acres.
"How this protects farmland is incomprehensible," Laurie said.
The DEIS also projects that only 18 percent of motorists will utilize
the rural bypass, while in 20 years the growth-induced traffic volume
on US-31 is expected to increase 19 percent.
"Because the nature of the farming business involves fewer people,
that doesn't mean the resource base - the land- is any less valuable
than a storefront. In fact, when non-ag business are displaced,
they look for new ground and rebuild. It's not that simple for the
farmer; you don't reconstruct farmland."
Ottawa County Farm Bureau, with more than 1,300 farm family members,
began a "Farmland not Freeways" campaign about three weeks ago
when leaks of a recommended rural bypass option began to surface.
"Considering the overwhelming evidence, testimony and correspondence
that's recorded in the DEIS, we never thought MDOT would seriously
consider this option as the best solution for the US-31 bottleneck,"
said Phil Kuyers, Ottawa County Farm Bureau president. "We're
incredibly disappointed with our state leaders, in the governor's
endorsement and the lack of leadership on this issue to make the right
decision - not the easy one - for future generations. We're not ready to
accept this as a reality and will peruse the proper channels to block this
unwanted development."
MDOT cannot proceed with the rural bypass option without approval from
federal agencies, including the Federal Highway Administration and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Michigan Farm Bureau; Ottawa County Farm Bureau; Michigan Farmland
and Community Alliance; West Michigan Environmental Action Council;
Committee for Alternatives to the Bypass; the townships of Olive,
Crockery and Robinson; and many concerned residents are petitioning
federal agencies and state legislators to reconsider.
Laurie described the rural bypass as a classic example of improper
planning. "In two or three generations down the road, if this
rural bypass goes through, agriculture will be virtually nonexistent
from I-96 to the lake," he said. "The townships affected
by this freeway have not planned for growth, nor do they want it. I
don't understand how this is in the best interest of the people of
Ottawa County, for agriculture or the state's economy."
Laurie's concerns are echoed throughout the DEIS. The U.S. Department
of Agriculture, in a letter dated Oct. 28, 1994, urged MDOT to,
"LEAVE IT WHERE IT IS. . . Fix if you have to, but leave
the agricultural corridor along . . . Can we really justify
the cost involved in building a new corridor thought the heart
of the best ag ground in the country? The feeling of the agricultural
sector is no . . . By fixing the existing US-31, it would take
less land, disrupt less people and would accomplish the task
with less money."
The rural bypass option is projected to cost $587.5 million,
which includes boulevard improvements on existing US-31, and
a freeway bypass of the Holland/Zeeland area and of Grand Haven
east of US-31. Reconstruction of US-31 into a limited access freeway
was estimated at $577.2 million.
In a letter dated Oct. 27, 1994, the U.S Fish and Wildlife
Service, in considering the impact a rural bypass would have on
forested wetlands, said,". . . an alignment alternative that
utilizes the existing roadways and thus minimize wetland impacts
would be preferred over a route on new alignments."
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, in a letter dated
Nov. 29, 1994, said, &Quot;We encourage you to devote a
substantial effort in the environmental document to the project's
secondary impacts associated with accelerated and expanded
development that may result from its approval. Induced growth can
eliminate forested areas used for wildlife habitat and will
put pressure on remaining areas."
The West Michigan Environmental Action Council urged MDOT, in
an Oct. 27, 1994, correspondence, to put land-use planning
before transportation planning. "At a time when the
concept of sustainable economy is just being defined, we would do
well to properly value the irreplaceable agricultural lands that
we are blessed with."
And in a May 24, 1999, letter signed by Michael Fortenbacker,
Crockery Township supervisor; Timothy Dykstra, Olive Township
supervisor; and Raymond Masko, Robinson Township supervisor,
the three townships jointly stated that a rural bypass option
would produce no winners. "US-31 will continue to
have large numbers of personal injury and fatal accidents. Our
wetlands, streams and rivers will suffer more damage and
destruction. Farming, as a major industry, will be only
a memory and we'll resemble Wayne, Oakland and Macomb
counties in more ways than we'd like to think about. The cities
of Grand Haven and Holland will lose their industry, commerce and
quality of life at an even more accelerated rate, leaving them
with but a shell of what they were, or could have been." |
| --30-- |
| Michigan farmers express international trade concerns |
| Contact: Ken Nye, 800-292-2680, ext. 2020 |
| |
| LANSING, June 24 - Several
Michigan farmers, representing a cross section of commodities,
last Thursday urged the U.S. Department of Agriculture and
the U.S. trade representative's office to strive for fair
trade and equal treatment around the world as they enter
the next round of World Trade Organization talks.
"We need a level playing field with market access, improved
dispute resolution and reduced barriers and subsidies,"
said John Weller, one of five Michigan farmers who represented
Michigan Farm Bureau at the June 24 session.
Weller, ad dairy farmer from Middleton, was joined by Monte
Bordner, a cattle producer from Sturgis; Pat Albright, a swine
farmer from Coldwater; Dave Girton, a grain and beef producer from
Coldwater; and Tony Raney, a greenhouse and nursery farmer from South
Lyon, in providing both statewide and commodity-specific
concerns with international trade.
Michigan Farm Bureau horticulture and forestry specialist Ken Nye
testified on behalf of the fruit and vegetable industry.
Michigan exports $887 million in food and ag products annually, which
directly supports more than 20,000 jobs and indirectly supports
many more, according to the Michigan Department of Agriculture.
Weller said dairy producers are still waiting for the market access dispute
with Canada, an 11-year struggle, to be resolved. "The Canadian
situation is the type of issue that makes producers wonder if trade
agreements work for us or against us," he said. "Trade-distorting
subsidies, whether internal or for export, need to be eliminated worldwide.
We cannot leave our industry open to unfairly subsidized competition, and
we must be prepared to retaliate."
The United States currently imports more beef than it exports. In 1999,
2.7 billion pounds of beef are expected to be imported. "All imported
agricultural products should be subject to the same inspection, sanitary,
quality, labeling and residue standards as domestic products,"
Bordner said during his testimony.
Bordner said unscientific standards have unfairly restricted entry of some
U.S. agricultural products to foreign commerce. "The current
beef hormone restrictions of the European Union on U.S.-produced beef
is an excellent example of an unwarranted food safety requirement
that is harming our export potential. This dispute has cost U.S.
beef producers billions of dollars in lost sales, you no satisfactory
resolution has been reached in this decade-old dispute. This is
frustrating to beef producers and clearly illustrates the need
to pursue quicker mechanisms for dispute resolution within the WTO."
Albright, a 3,000-head, farrow-to-finish hog producer, gave another
livestock perspective. "The need to expand markets before expanding
production is all to vivid in my memory," he said, alluding to
recent hog prices that dipped to 30-year lows. "Our only
place for real market growth is in the international marketplace.
We have the ability to produce and deliver a quality pork product. All we
need now is the opportunity to compete fairly in all markets - foreign
and domestic."
Given 95 percent of the world's consumers are outside the United
States, testimony centered on tapping those markets. &Quot;With
our Freedom to Farm act, U.S. agriculture is even more dependent on
the world market," said Girton. "Given access, we
believe that American agriculture can compete on an even
footing with other production regions. We cannot sit idly and
watch our competitors gain negotiating advantage over us -
negotiations must proceed in a timely manner."
Canada is one of the largest trading partners with the United States,
but licensing restrictions and other non-tariff barriers have impacted
not only the dairy and poultry industries, but fruits and vegetables,
as well. "Non-tariff barriers have been imposed on commodities
such as apples and potatoes that need to be identified and
corrected," Nye said. "Michigan producers have first-hand
knowledge of Canadian licensing and grading requirements that
have unfairly restricted our fruit and vegetable exports into
their markets. In light of the fully implemented U.S.-Canadian
free trade agreement, we wonder how such restrictions can still
exist in our so-called open market. Let's fix these problems with
a good agreement, backed up with strong enforcement."
Michigan is traditionally the third-largest apple-producing state
in the United States and the leading apple processor - but that
may change if China is allowed to continue dumping apple juice
concentrate in the United States. An anti-dumping petition
was introduced just a couple of weeks ago asking for a 91
percent duty on imported apple juice concentrate from China.
"We hope this will offer expedient and fair relief for
our apple producers who have been suffering hardships due to
China's dumping of apply juice concentrate," Nye said.
As the owner of a family-operated commercial greenhouse and nursery
business, Raney said the U.S. imports about four times more in dollar
volume of greenhouse, nursery and sod products than it exports.
"A significant portion of the import volume is in cut flowers,
which have displaced a large portion of U.S. production,"
Raney said. "We can compete with these imports as long as they
are not subsidized or dumped (sold for less than the cost of production)
in our market."
Raney also expressed concern over currency exchange rates and their
impact on trade. "We have seen Canadian producers target the
U.S. market for shipments of greenhouse products because of the favorable
exchange rate," he said. "I encourage the development of a
mechanism to recognize exchange rates as a potential illegal trade
practice."
The Indianapolis meeting is one of several being held across the
United States this summer to compile issues and concerns that
may be raised at the WTO negotiation session on agriculture this fall
in Seattle, Wash. |
| --30-- |
Editors: A written copy of testimony is
available by calling Ken Nye at (800) 292-2680, ext. 2020.
Producers who testified can be reached at the following phone
numbers:
| Pat Albright |
(517) 238-2479 |
| David Girton |
(616) 651-8941 |
| Tony Raney |
(248) 437-2863 |
| John Weller |
(517) 236-5431 |
| Monte Bordner |
(616) 651-8353 | |
| Michigan Farmland and Community Alliance formed to
help preserve farmland and viability of agriculture |
| Contact: Jim Fuerstenau, 800-292-2680, ext. 6550 |
| |
| LANSING, June 24 - The Michigan
agriculture industry pumps more than $35 billion into the economy
each year. In the effort to protect farmland and strengthen
Michigan's second-largest industry, the Michigan Farmland and Community
Alliance (MFCA) has been formed.
The Michigan Farm Bureau board of directors recently approved the bylaws
for the new alliance that will work with other organizations with similar
mission statements to ensure the viability of agriculture in Michigan
for present and future generations.
Jim Fuerstenau was hired in March as the executive director of
the alliance. &Quot;The goal is to permanently preserve large,
contiguous blocks of farmland in Michigan and to work to increase
profitability of agriculture,&Quot; he said. &Quot;Together,
these two goals will help stabilize and improve the long-term
opportunities for ag producers.&Quot;
The Michigan Farm Bureau Board appointed six Farm Bureau members to
the alliance board of directors, which can include up to 11 members
in the future. Board members for the alliance include: Jack Laurie,
president, and Wayne Wood, Paul Koeman, Alan Garner, Brigette Leach
and Mike Fusilier.
"There are many, many needs throughout the state of Michigan, for
information concerning the issue of farmland preservation,"
Fuerstenau said. "The alliance will seek to create a business
environment that would facilitate long-range economic decision-making,
opportunities for ag producers, support businesses and policy makers."
According to Michigan's 1997 Census of Agriculture, more than 1 million
acres of Michigan farmland have been lost during the last 15 years.
And, in the last five years, 270,000 acres of cropland were converted
to other uses.
The alliance will continue to investigate and promote farmland preservation
options, such as agricultural security areas, purchase of development
rights, transfer of development rights and use-value assessment
on farmland.
Michigan's economy is good right now, but from an economic standpoint,
the state has always relied on agriculture for stability, Fuerstenau
said. "If we're already losing 10 acres of farmland every hour of
every day, what's going to happen when the population grows by 1.1 million
people over the next 20 years?" Fuerstenau asked. |
| --30-- |
| Farm Bureau Quick Facts |
| |
| Did you know that the average American farmer feeds 128
people plus you? There are fewer than 2 million farmers and
ranchers working America's farmland, yet they are continually
looked upon to help feed, clothe and shelter the world.
Farmers and ranchers provide food and habitat for 75 percent
of the nation's wildlife.
It takes just 40 days for most Americans to earn enough money
to pay for their food supply for the entire year.
Did you know that peanuts are not actually nuts? Peanuts, like
soybeans, are members of the legume family.
One acre of land roughly the size of a football field can
produce: 24,000 heads of lettuce, 45,500 lbs. of strawberries,
36,000 lbs. of potatoes, 28,800 lbs. of navel oranges,
14,000 sweet corn plants or 1,328 lbs of cotton lint.
American agriculture is the nation's largest employer,
with more than 22 million people working in some phase -
from growing food and fiber to selling it at the supermarket.
In 1855, Michigan became one of the first states, along with
Pennsylvania, to establish a state agricultural college.
Michigan is the second most diverse agricultural base in the
nation. In 1997, Michigan led the nation in the production of
10 commodities: dry black beans, dry cranberry beans, dry navy
beans, blueberries, tart cherries, cucumbers for pickles,
geraniums (pots, seed and cuttings), flowering
hanging baskets (except petunias), Easter lilies in pots,
and flats of petunias.
Did you know that the apple is the most versatile fruit?
Archeologists have found evidence that humans have enjoyed eating
apples since 6500 B.C. Besides being ideal for eating, fresh
apples can be baked, used in pies, cooked for sauce, and pressed
into cider and juice. Commercial processors use Michigan
apples for pie slices, sauce, juice and baby food. Michigan is
also the nation's leading supplier of apple splices for makers
of frozen apple pies and pie filling.
Instead of going to the land fill, gypsum waste from electric
power plant smokestacks can be sold to farmers. Although it is
still in the research stage, farmers are able to apply it to their
land while raising soybeans and corn. By using gypsum, you are
protecting soil from erosion. |
| --30-- |
|